Sliver

Sharon Stone’s Carly Norris – a Manhattan book editor – moves from ‘the village’ into the Sliver building, a ruddy coloured high-rise, thrusting its tip into the sky like it was asked to solve a math problem at the blackboard. We primarily see the building from the ground up, its length and width either exciting or intimidating. The truth, however, is this: it’s not the size that matters, it’s what you do with it.  

The Sliver building can be limp and uninspired in key aspects: cramped, badly designed kitchens; no in suite laundry; mirrored, sliding closet doors-a tacky way to otherwise enliven a boxy master bedroom. The building can also pound away incessantly at you with its gauche aesthetic. Every bathroom has fixtures and layouts ideal for staging pornography scenes. The male tenants are leering creeps and are sometimes murderous on top of it. The overhead lighting cuts out just when you need it most (I.e. running for your life from a homicidal maniac in a steep stairwell.) The owner is disinterested in repairs while also surveilling his tenants via surreptitious spy cameras installed in their apartments. 

Hacked Webcam

Girl, put some tape over your webcam!

A new Baldwin is manufactured for every role the Alec model shows interest in but eventually turns down and Sliver‘s prototype is named William, who plays the building’s voyeuristic owner, Zeke. Zeke’s apartment suggests a certain arrested development with its student dormitory disarray, but a secret central command for his spy operation hiding within his apartment tells us otherwise. There is a control and attention to detail and a design sensibility (like if Batman commanded the bridge of the Enterprise) that betray the maturity and patience it takes to see through a project of such scope. His spy rec room is a sanctuary for his secrets. The residents of his building are not granted the same privilege of a private space in their units. Zeke oversees all as a passive watcher, content to label what he sees as ‘soap operas,’ scooping up knowledge about the private lives of his tenants, but only acting on what he see when it furthers his interests (sex, murder, preferred flower arrangements of potential dates). 

Carly’s work as an editor of books personifies in her a belief in narrative, particularly in the activity of articulating and bolstering aspects of story that demand action. She is somewhat turned on by Zeke’s voyeurism, but is eventually sickened by Zeke’s insistence that they only watch. Carly eventually gains the pallor and disheveledness of an individual who has spent extended time in isolation with pornographic cinema. She has watched plenty of sex between consenting adults, but she has also witnessed secret addictions, domestic violence and a mother’s rejection of her daughter’s assertion that she has been sexually assaulted by her step-father. Her shame for her transgression of spying overwhelms her conviction that she should act on what she has seen. 

Too much porn

Can’t stop nosing in other people’s business

In a March 2018 interview, Sharon Stone reminisces with invigorating frankness about the state of mind and motives propelling Sliver’s production: 

 “Well, frankly, most people making that film were nuts. They were trying to repackage me after Basic Instinct and I think they were just attempting to take that movie’s energy and squeeze another hit out of it. I think they kind of did it but they could have done a better job.” 

Carly is scripted as a woman consistently surprised at the doings of others. Stone, however, radiates a vivid intelligence that shreds this enforced naiveté and layers nuances into material meant to be consumed superficially. Instead of being a separate entity we relate to via her motivation and choices, Carly, due to her embodiment by Stone, becomes an audience surrogate, lamenting the destructive ego of the surveillance state. 

Joe Eszterhas, the writer of Sliver, Basic Instinct and other canonical works of A-list smut, liberally tinted his work with feminist flourishes. An Eszterhausian woman is equipped to rail against the paper bag authority figures who arbitrarily stand in her way. Clothing is optional. In Showgirls, a woman is prompted to violently fight the systems of oppression around her. In Basic Instinct, a man is drawn to a submissive relationship with a queer woman who is deploying her homicidal tendencies toward clearing out patriarchal excess.  In Sliver, a woman destroys her means of seeing with a penetrative and intrusive gaze after being seduced then sickened by its soullessness. 

Justice Judy

Justice Judy

Earlier in the film, Carly’s assistant Judy (Colleen Camp) cheers on Carly’s move to the Sliver as an opportunity for “new adventures, new horizons, new lovers, new orgasms!”  Carly has desires that are dangerous or benign depending on how they are acted out while Zeke’s gets off observing individuals crush themselves under the weight of their secrets. Rebecca Solnit, in A Field Guide to Getting Lost, relates a story of classical lore where Justice “stood at the gates of Hades deciding who would go in[. To] go in was to be chosen for refinement through suffering, adventure, transformation, a punishing route to the reward that is the transformed self.” Perhaps Judy, with her enthusiasm for “new adventures, etc.,” is Justice for Carly, gently guiding her towards the hell of dating Zeke so that a transformed version of herself might emerge. After Carly fires a bullet between the eyes of Zeke’s pervy control room she says flatly, “Get a life.” It’s an admonishment as much to herself as it is to him. 

Sliver was released in 1993 and was directed by Phillip Noyce.

Originally published on January 17, 2019.

Updated January 22, 2019 to include new post category and tags.

WORKS CITED 

Solnit, Rebecca. A Field Guide to Getting Lost. New York: Viking, 2005 

Thompson, Simon. “Sharon Stone on Her First $100 Paycheck And Her Fight To Direct.” Forbes.com. March 7, 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonthompson/2018/03/07/sharon-stone-on-her-first-100-paycheck-and-her-fight-to-direct/

Final Analysis

Dr. Isaac Barr (Richard Gere), about a third of the way into Final Analysis (1992), tells us “A shoe salesman looks at people’s feet. I look at their thoughts.”  He’s a Freudian psychiatrist probing Diana’s (Uma Thurman) dreams of flower arranging and gun handling for subsumed sexual motivation while letting the trauma of a past sexual assault she hints at flop around the session like a trout suffocating on a dock. 

Directed with a De Palmaniac flair by Phil Joanou (and dodging a loan shark for debts owed to Vertigo), Final Analysis asks who gets the last word on wrongdoing: the perpetrator or the bystander. Kim Basinger enters the plot as Heather, Diana’s sister, ready to provide to Isaac the family backstory Diana is reluctant to reveal in her sessions. Heather and Isaac quickly become lovers, though Heather has not arranged a non-monogamous relationship with Jimmy Evans (Eric Roberts), her “Greek Orthodox gangster” husband. 

“Fucking his wife is like teasing King Kong,” a lawyer friend of Isaac’s says of Jimmy. We are told that Jimmy was born Dimitri Evangelou in Greece, emigrated from Athens at 18 “to avoid the draft,” and presently works in construction, pension fund scams, bid rigging, and money laundering.  Eric Roberts’ tanned, toned form is coiled tight, making him the ideal heartthrob for the folks who eroticise tangles of copper wire. His introductory scene in the film concludes with Heather fellating him under strongly implied physical threat.  

My kind of scrap metal yard

Coiled tight

The foundation of Final Analysis is a set of assumptions about the world it seeks to portray. One is that corruption and violence are not abhorrent enough in and of themselves. Another is that the phrase “Greek Orthodox” evokes otherness and that otherness naturally evokes danger. If one wishes to make a connection between these two assumptions, Final Analysis is not preventing one from doing so. However, it must be said that Eric Roberts is nowhere near as hairy nor tall as King Kong and that the comparison is an inappropriate one. 

Where Jimmy is a threat to Heather (and Isaac and Diana by their association with her), one can’t help feel that both Heather and Diana are not exactly safe with Isaac either. He boasts to a buddy of Diana, “I have an attractive-seductive young woman for a patient!” The same buddy–he is a psychological expert Heather will call on later–loudly declares “No woman is so beautiful your normal thought processes fly out of your head” just as Heather walks into the room and he subsequently loses his train of thought. Heather and Diana are portrayed as desired objects for the men around them and it is not a stretch that if they are able to escape the clutches of Jimmy, Isaac and his cronies are not going to be much help afterwards. 

My dinner with the Evans couple

Pathological intoxication

Heather kills Jimmy during a spell of pathological intoxication, a crime for which she is found not guilty by reason of temporary insanity thanks to the testimony of Isaac and the psychological expert buddy, as well as his lawyer friend’s defence. Isaac then learns that Heather is to receive a giant insurance pay-out and suspects she may have pre-meditated the murder of Jimmy all along. At this point, the questions of ‘do all murders need to be avenged?’ and ‘do I really want to watch the rest of this movie?’ fuel the engine of the second half of the film. Isaac elects to sort out Heather’s plot, less so out of an obligation to pursue justice for Jimmy than his need to avenge his humiliation at being so manipulated by a woman. Heather living out her days with a tidy insurance sum and free of a dangerous asshole is a happy ending for a film meant for children. Final Analysis’ gaze is directed toward sleek, grown-up problems, not fairy tales about financial security and freedom from violence. 

The film’s real-world point-of-view is that men are excused of a lack of control when it comes to beautiful women and said beautiful women are not equally excused taking advantage of that lack of control. And women deserve to be punished if they manipulate you into helping their perverse campaign for freedom. That the word ‘dumbbell’ – the object itself is a plot McGruffin – is used to excess in the dialogue underscores the stupefying wonder to behold in Isaac’s effort to reclaim his manhood. Final Analysis boasts a shattering thesis: it is easier to concoct a two-year plot to manipulate a dumbbell mental health professional to justify you killing your husband than it is to count on the economic, social and legal support needed to successfully leave an abusive relationship. 

Originally published on January 9, 2019.

Updated on January 22, 2019 to included new post category and tags.